Friday, March 18, 2016

Justice Impairment

Medea's concept of justice has been blurred by her wrath against Jason and his new royal family. Justice usually coincides with the concept of peace. What Medea has plotted to do is the complete opposite. Her definition of justice would be to avenge the pain that Jason has put upon her by leaving her for a new wife. She wants to inflict this amount of pain back on Jason. That is not justice. Justice is overcoming wrong doings, and doing what is moral. When Medea reveals what she plans to do, the chorus comes in as the voice of reason saying "we beg you not to do this." They see the morality that Medea is too enraged to see.
 http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/the-meaning-of-justice
Medea is carrying out her form of justice by poisoning Jason's new wife, then after killing her own children. She will then let Jason live through the rest of his miserable days. Justice always seems to be a debatable topic in society, but in no way are any of Medea's plans moral. She is willing to go all the way in killing her own kids just to get her revenge on Jason. She just wants him to feel how she feels now they he has abandoned her. Medea's plot is a clear representation of how revenge often very much differs from justice. Jason may have done wrong, but he even offers Medea money to take care of their children. She is too enraged to take this offer, and only has her eyes set on killing him. Her anger overrides any form of morality, leading to justice impairment. Although she believes she's doing the right thing, it is actually the complete opposite.

5 comments:

  1. In today's standards, most people go by the cliche "two wrongs don't make a right." However, in Greek society, maybe two wrongs make a right. Vengeance is a common theme in many Greek literature, such as the Odyssey, and seems to been an ethical solution to some conflicts. The Greeks generally appeal to the Gods about their revenge. In most cases, their culture views the outcome of retribution as just and moral.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Medea's tainted concept of justice acts as her hamartia, which ultimately will result in her down fall. Although she is the victim of adultery and betrayal, Medea's want for vengeance and "justice" will end in disaster. With the story being labeled as a tragedy, one may predict Medea's fate will be determined by this fatal flaw.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can also see her "tainted concept of justice" as hubris as well because Medea is extremely prideful and therefore sees her revenge as black and white. It's very arrogant of her to view justice and the way her husband will "feel the most pain" (816) as killing her own bloodline. Revenge is all or nothing to her and only a person with excessive pride would view it in such a way.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Medea's sense of justice is rather skewed. Her problem is with Jason, not his new girl, or even the children Medea and Jason share. Medea's thinking process is corrupted by the pain Jason's adultery has caused. Medea has every right to be mad and want revenge on Jason, but Medea hurts the innocent in her process of revenge. Medea keeps commiting sins for Jason. First fratricide, then homicide, and infanticide.

    ReplyDelete