Friday, March 18, 2016

Gender Inequality: Unethical?

            The first and second episodes in Medea highlight the unjust structure and view of women in the Greek society. In the beginning of Episode I, Medea remarks the unfair conditions that women are forced to endure in Greek culture.  She explains to the chorus, “we women are the sorriest lot: first we must at a great expenditure of money buy a husband and even take on a master over our body… it is not possible to say no to one's husband” (231-237). The lines demonstrate the harshness surrounding Greek females. They are not allowed to be independent and must always rely on and abide to their husband under all circumstances. Most people may think that Greek women have an easy life since they are completely reliant; however, Medea, a strong female protagonist, disagrees with this concept. She claims, “I would rather stand three times in the line of battle than once bear a child” (250-251). Due to this statute of limitation, Medea is trapped in a situation where her husband can leave her while other people view her as a “foolish woman” (333) for complaining.
            In Episode II, Jason lashes at the role and existence of women. He boldly declares, “There should be some other way for men to produce children. Women would not have to exist at all. And then humanity would be saved a lot of trouble” (573-575). In this statement, Jason asserts his belief that women were created only for the purpose of giving birth to children. He thinks the world will be more fortunate if woman are nonexistent and implies they don’t deserve an equal treatment as men. Discriminating ideas, like Jason’s belief, are the reason why there is a gender barrier between men and women.

2 comments:

  1. I agree with your assessment of the gender inequality evident in Medea. However, It is also worth considering the argument between Medea and Jason as one between a married couple. Although it is undeniable that women are treated unfairly in the play, it is also true that we may be placing too much emphasis on this fact. As a bickering couple, it is entirely possible that Jason and Medea are simply speaking out of anger and bitterness. Jason may not be as misogynistic as we think, especially in the context of his time period and the state of his marriage. Also, Medea only began to complain about her status in society after Jason's affair. She even stated that it would be acceptable for him to take another woman if he didn't have children. In my opinion, Medea isn't as strong and as feminist as she pretends to be.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The gender roles that appear in Greek Literature are still present today. Their is definitely a double-standard when it comes to Jason's affair. Since he is a man, Jason is not harshly judged for marrying another woman, and leaving his wife and children behind. If Medea ran off with another man, however, she would be punished by the Greek Gods and be considered an unfaithful whore. Unfortunately, society's ideas and beliefs have not changed and women are still seen as subordinates to men.

    ReplyDelete